Ok, let’s kill the frustration.

Why was I that stupid to think it would be easily possible to craft math inside a text or html environment? Well that is because there exist websites where as a reader you comment on stuff, you can actually include math in your answer or comment…
But stuff like that is hard work, so for the time being I have to accept that I need to go on with the old way: Producing math and turn that into A4 sized pictures in the jpg format.

The setback is: when the math is all jpg pictures, no search engine can find the stuff…
So that is frustrating, on the other hand I end plenty of high enough when it comes to math and search engines; that means the old way was inefficient in speed but not in depth.

The next picture shows that on the previous website (kinkytshirts.nl) I rank about number 4 when you search for ‘3D numbers do not exist’.

Now I know a lot of stuff, but it beats me as why this update is so high in the Google search engine stuff while this is a real hardcore update related to 5D complex numbers…

 

18-11-2015=screenshot_golden_ratio

And going from one website to the other: pictures like the above should look like they are 450 by 600 pixels. But they don’t, ok ok I understand that in the year 2015 everything must be scaleable because all those mobile things like phones have there own screens and so.

Anyway, after the learning curve has been taken more and more posts will be added. See ya around.

__________

Useful links if you want to know a bit more about 3D complex numbers:

kinkytshirts.nl

Introduction to 3D complex numbers.

For centuries the complex plane \mathbb{C} is in use where we identify the x-axis with the real numbers and the y-axis with the imaginary numbers.

The number i is the imaginary unit and for centuries we know that i^2 = -1.

A few centuries people have been looking to some extension of \mathbb{C} to \mathbb{R}^3 and always they tried to have the complex plane included into the 3D real vector space. It turned out this was not possible as highlighted by a theorem known as the 2-4-8 theorem. But this theorem uses as an assumption that this extension to 3 dimensions should be bases on some quadratic form just like you can view the complex plane as generated by z^2 = -1 .
Complex numbers are usually written as z = x + yi.

At present day it is generally assumed 3D complex numbers are not possible.
Yet in the year 1990 I found them, you must not use quadratic stuff in \mathbb{R}^3 but cubic stuff like trying to solve X^3 = -1
This approach gives rise to complex numbers of the form

X = x +  y j + z j^2

where if
j^3 = -1 this is the complex multiplication and if
j^3 = 1 this is the circular multiplication in \mathbb{R}^3 .

In this introductory post today we only look at the complex version of stuff.

Complex numbers can be added via adding the real parts and the two corresponding imaginary parts.
Example X = 2 + 3j + 5j^2 and Y = 1 + j - 4j^2 gives the sum

X + Y = 3 + 4j + j^2.

__________

This obviously will not work, if a very simple formulae like X = x + yj + xj^2 already does ‘not parse’ this website will never run properly. So I need to rethink a little bit; it sounded so nice you can write Latex into your posts but this is more a bucket of shit since there are two different plugin’s that fail.
End of this temporary post.